Retatrutide vs Ozempic: Triple Agonist vs Single Agonist Comparison

28.7% vs 15% weight loss: How adding two more hormone pathways changes everything

By
RetaWeightLoss.com
25 Feb 2026
5 min read
Share this post
Retatrutide vs Ozempic: Triple Agonist vs Single Agonist Comparison

Introduction

Ozempic (semaglutide) revolutionized obesity treatment when it showed 15% average weight loss in the STEP trials. For the first time, a medication approached weight loss results previously seen only with bariatric surgery. Then came retatrutide.

TRIUMPH-4 results from December 2025 showed retatrutide achieving 28.7% weight loss—nearly double Ozempic's effect. The difference? Ozempic activates one hormone receptor (GLP-1). Retatrutide activates three (GLP-1, GIP, glucagon). More pathways, more weight loss.

But higher efficacy means higher side effects. Retatrutide causes dysesthesia in 1 in 5 patients at the highest dose—abnormal touch sensations not seen with Ozempic. Discontinuation rates are higher. Cost will be higher. And it won't be available until 2028.

This comparison examines mechanism differences, weight loss efficacy, side effect profiles, cardiovascular benefits, approval status, and which medication makes sense for which patients.

The Mechanisms: Single vs Triple Hormone Activation

Ozempic (Semaglutide): GLP-1 Single Agonist

Semaglutide is 94% structurally identical to natural human GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1), a hormone released by the intestines after eating.

How It Works:

  • Binds to GLP-1 receptors in the brain's hypothalamus
  • Increases satiety signals—you feel full faster and stay full longer
  • Slows gastric emptying—food stays in the stomach longer
  • Enhances insulin secretion when blood sugar rises
  • Reduces appetite and total calorie intake

Why It's Effective:GLP-1 is the body's primary fullness hormone. Artificially elevating GLP-1 levels tricks the brain into feeling satisfied with less food. Patients naturally eat 500-800 fewer calories daily without conscious restriction.

The Single-Pathway Limitation:Ozempic works entirely through appetite suppression. It doesn't increase metabolic rate. It doesn't directly promote fat burning. Weight loss comes solely from eating less.

Retatrutide: GLP-1 + GIP + Glucagon Triple Agonist

Retatrutide activates three complementary hormone pathways simultaneously.

Pathway 1: GLP-1 (Same as Ozempic)

  • Appetite suppression
  • Slowed gastric emptying
  • Enhanced insulin secretion

Pathway 2: GIP (Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide)

  • Amplifies GLP-1 satiety effects
  • Improves insulin sensitivity
  • May directly affect fat cell metabolism
  • Enhances nutrient partitioning

Pathway 3: Glucagon

  • Increases energy expenditure (metabolic rate)
  • Promotes lipolysis (fat breakdown)
  • May prevent metabolic adaptation during weight loss
  • Potentially increases thermogenesis

The Triple-Pathway Advantage: Retatrutide attacks obesity from both directions: reduce calories in (GLP-1 + GIP) AND increase calories out (glucagon). This dual approach produces greater weight loss than appetite suppression alone.

Weight Loss Efficacy: Head-to-Head Comparison

Primary Phase 3 Trial Results

Medication Trial Duration Dose Weight Loss vs Placebo
Retatrutide TRIUMPH-4 68 weeks 12mg 28.7% +26.6%
Ozempic/Wegovy STEP 1 68 weeks 2.4mg 14.9% +12.4%
Retatrutide — TRIUMPH-4 (12mg)
Duration 68 weeks
Weight Loss 28.7%
vs Placebo +26.6%

Ozempic/Wegovy — STEP 1 (2.4mg)
Duration 68 weeks
Weight Loss 14.9%
vs Placebo +12.4%


Difference: Retatrutide produces 13.8 percentage points more weight loss than semaglutide.

Real-World Translation

For a 250-pound person:

Medication Pounds Lost Final Weight Percentage Lost
Retatrutide 12mg 72 lbs 178 lbs 28.7%
Ozempic 2.4mg 37 lbs 213 lbs 14.9%
Retatrutide 12mg
Pounds Lost 72 lbs
Final Weight 178 lbs
Percentage Lost 28.7%

Ozempic 2.4mg
Pounds Lost 37 lbs
Final Weight 213 lbs
Percentage Lost 14.9%


Difference: Retatrutide loses 35 more pounds than Ozempic.

Percentage Achieving Weight Loss Thresholds

Threshold Retatrutide 12mg Ozempic 2.4mg Difference
≥5% loss 94.6% 86.4% +8.2%
≥10% loss 91.3% 69.1% +22.2%
≥15% loss 83.2% 48.9% +34.3%
≥20% loss 72.5% 35.5% +37.0%
≥25% loss 58.6% 13.2% +45.4%
≥5% Loss
Retatrutide 12mg94.6%
Ozempic 2.4mg86.4%
Difference+8.2%

≥10% Loss
Retatrutide 12mg91.3%
Ozempic 2.4mg69.1%
Difference+22.2%

≥15% Loss
Retatrutide 12mg83.2%
Ozempic 2.4mg48.9%
Difference+34.3%

≥20% Loss
Retatrutide 12mg72.5%
Ozempic 2.4mg35.5%
Difference+37.0%

≥25% Loss
Retatrutide 12mg58.6%
Ozempic 2.4mg13.2%
Difference+45.4%


At moderate thresholds (≥5-10%), both perform well. At higher thresholds (≥20%), retatrutide substantially outperforms. Nearly 3 in 4 retatrutide patients lose ≥20% compared to 1 in 3 on Ozempic.

Side Effect Profiles: What to Expect

Gastrointestinal Side Effects

Both medications cause GI symptoms because slowing gastric emptying is part of their mechanism.

Nausea Incidence:

Medication Dose Nausea Rate vs Placebo
Retatrutide 12mg 43% 9%
Ozempic 2.4mg 44% 16%
Retatrutide — 12mg
Nausea Rate 43%
vs Placebo 9%

Ozempic — 2.4mg
Nausea Rate 44%
vs Placebo 16%


Nausea rates are virtually identical. Both medications peak during dose escalation (weeks 1-12) then improve substantially.

Diarrhea and Vomiting:

Side Effect Retatrutide 12mg Ozempic 2.4mg
Diarrhea 33% 30%
Vomiting 21% 24%
Diarrhea
Retatrutide 12mg 33%
Ozempic 2.4mg 30%

Vomiting
Retatrutide 12mg 21%
Ozempic 2.4mg 24%


GI side effect profiles are comparable. Neither has a clear tolerability advantage based on nausea, diarrhea, or vomiting alone.

Dysesthesia: Retatrutide's Unique Safety Signal

The Critical Difference:

Medication Dysesthesia Incidence
Retatrutide 12mg 20.9%
Retatrutide 9mg 8.8%
Ozempic 2.4mg Not observed
Retatrutide 12mg
Dysesthesia Incidence 20.9%

Retatrutide 9mg
Dysesthesia Incidence 8.8%

Ozempic 2.4mg
Dysesthesia Incidence Not observed


Dysesthesia—abnormal touch sensations like tingling, numbness, or uncomfortable feeling when touched—affects 1 in 5 retatrutide patients at the highest dose. This side effect wasn't seen in Phase 2 trials and doesn't occur with Ozempic or other GLP-1 medications.

Clinical Significance:Eli Lilly reported dysesthesia was "generally mild" and "rarely led to discontinuation," but 20.9% incidence is substantial. Whether it resolves with continued treatment or persists long-term is unknown.

Discontinuation Rates Due to Adverse Events

Medication Dose Discontinuation Rate
Retatrutide 12mg 18.2%
Retatrutide 9mg 12.2%
Ozempic 2.4mg 7.0%
Retatrutide — 12mg
Discontinuation Rate 18.2%

Retatrutide — 9mg
Discontinuation Rate 12.2%

Ozempic — 2.4mg
Discontinuation Rate 7.0%


Retatrutide's discontinuation rate is 2.6x higher than Ozempic. Higher efficacy comes with reduced tolerability.

Cardiovascular Benefits: Blood Pressure, Lipids, and Heart Health

Blood Pressure Reduction

Medication Systolic BP Reduction
Retatrutide 12mg -14.0 mmHg
Ozempic 2.4mg -6.2 mmHg
Retatrutide 12mg
Systolic BP Reduction -14.0 mmHg

Ozempic 2.4mg
Systolic BP Reduction -6.2 mmHg


Retatrutide produces 2.3x greater blood pressure lowering than Ozempic. A 14 mmHg reduction translates to roughly 25-30% lower cardiovascular event risk based on epidemiological models.

Lipid Improvements

Both medications improve lipid profiles, though data suggests retatrutide produces larger changes:

Lipid Parameter Retatrutide Effect Ozempic Effect
Triglycerides -35 to -45% -20 to -25%
Non-HDL Cholesterol -15 to -20% -10 to -12%
Triglycerides
Retatrutide Effect -35 to -45%
Ozempic Effect -20 to -25%

Non-HDL Cholesterol
Retatrutide Effect -15 to -20%
Ozempic Effect -10 to -12%


Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials

Ozempic (Wegovy) - SELECT Trial:

  • Status: Completed
  • Result: 20% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke, CV death)
  • Significance: First obesity medication proven to prevent heart attacks and strokes

Retatrutide - TRIUMPH CVOT:

  • Status: Ongoing
  • Expected Completion: 2027-2028
  • Significance: Must prove cardiovascular safety and ideally event reduction before approval

Key Difference: Ozempic has proven cardiovascular protection. Retatrutide's effects on actual cardiovascular events (not just risk factors) remain unknown.

Approval Status and Availability

Ozempic/Wegovy: FDA Approved

Ozempic (0.5mg, 1mg, 2mg):

  • Approved: December 2017
  • Indication: Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk reduction
  • Availability: Widely available now

Wegovy (2.4mg):

  • Approved: June 2021
  • Indications: Obesity, cardiovascular risk reduction, MASH treatment
  • Availability: Available now (supply improved in 2024-2025)

Insurance Coverage:

  • ~60-70% of commercial plans cover
  • Requires prior authorization
  • Monthly cost: $1,349 (Wegovy), $936 (Ozempic)

Retatrutide: Investigational

Status: Phase 3 trials ongoingExpected NDA Submission: Q4 2026 or Q1 2027Expected FDA Approval: Late 2027Expected Commercial Launch: Early 2028

Predicted Insurance Coverage:

  • Initial coverage: 40-50% of plans
  • Will likely require:
    • Prior authorization
    • Trial-and-failure of Ozempic or tirzepatide
    • BMI ≥35 or ≥30 with complications

Predicted Cost: $1,200-1,500/month (premium to tirzepatide due to higher efficacy)

Dosing and Administration

Ozempic/Wegovy Titration Schedule

Titration:

  • Weeks 1-4: 0.25mg
  • Weeks 5-8: 0.5mg
  • Weeks 9-12: 1.0mg
  • Weeks 13-16: 1.7mg
  • Week 17+: 2.4mg maintenance

Total time to max dose: 17 weeks

Advantage: Very gradual escalation minimizes side effects. Can stay at any dose if tolerating poorly.

Retatrutide Titration Schedule

Titration:

  • Weeks 1-4: 2mg
  • Weeks 5-8: 4mg
  • Weeks 9-12: 6mg
  • Weeks 13-16: 9mg OR 12mg
  • Week 17+: Maintenance

Total time to max dose: 16-20 weeks

Similarity: Both require ~4 months of gradual escalation.

Administration

Both: Once-weekly subcutaneous injection

  • Same convenience
  • Same injection technique
  • Same sites (abdomen, thigh, upper arm)

Timeline to Results

Ozempic (Wegovy)

Week 4: 2-3% weight loss (5-8 lbs)

Week 12: 6-8% weight loss (15-20 lbs)

Week 24: 10-12% weight loss (25-30 lbs)

Week 48: 14-15% weight loss (35-37 lbs)

Week 68: 14.9% weight loss (37 lbs for 250-lb person)

Retatrutide

Week 4: 2-4% weight loss (5-10 lbs)

Week 12: 12-15% weight loss (30-37 lbs)

Week 24: 17-20% weight loss (42-50 lbs)

Week 48: 22-24% weight loss (55-60 lbs)

Week 68: 28.7% weight loss (72 lbs for 250-lb person)

Key Difference: Retatrutide produces substantially more weight loss at every timepoint after week 12.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Cost Per Pound Lost (Estimated Annual Cost)

Ozempic (Wegovy):

  • Annual cost: $16,188
  • Pounds lost in year 1: ~35 lbs
  • Cost per pound: $463

Retatrutide (Predicted):

  • Annual cost: $15,600-18,000 (estimated)
  • Pounds lost in year 1: ~60 lbs
  • Cost per pound: $260-300

Despite higher absolute cost, retatrutide may be more cost-effective per pound lost.

Insurance Coverage Reality

Most patients won't pay list price due to:

  • Insurance coverage (if approved)
  • Manufacturer savings cards
  • Patient assistance programs

Expected Out-of-Pocket:

  • With good insurance: $25-100/month for either
  • Without coverage: $1,300-1,500/month for either

Which Medication for Which Patient?

Ozempic (Wegovy) Is Best For:

Ideal Candidates:

  • BMI 30-40 without severe complications
  • Patients wanting proven cardiovascular protection (SELECT trial)
  • Those sensitive to side effects (can titrate very slowly)
  • People who need medication NOW (not 2 years from now)
  • Patients with existing insurance coverage for Wegovy

Advantages:

  • FDA approved and available
  • Proven cardiovascular event reduction (20% in SELECT)
  • 5+ years real-world safety data
  • Established insurance coverage pathways

Disadvantages:

  • Lower efficacy (15% vs 28.7%)
  • May not achieve weight loss goals for BMI ≥40
  • Still expensive (~$1,349/month)

Retatrutide Is Best For:

Ideal Candidates:

  • BMI ≥40 (Class III obesity) needing maximum weight loss
  • Patients who tried Ozempic/Wegovy without adequate results
  • Those wanting to avoid bariatric surgery
  • People with multiple severe obesity complications
  • Patients willing to wait until 2028 for availability

Advantages:

  • Highest efficacy (28.7% weight loss)
  • Approaching bariatric surgery results
  • Superior blood pressure reduction
  • Multiple potential indications (obesity, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea)

Disadvantages:

  • Not yet available (late 2027/early 2028)
  • Dysesthesia affecting 1 in 5 patients at 12mg
  • Higher side effect burden (18.2% discontinuation)
  • Limited long-term safety data (<2 years)
  • Expected restrictive insurance coverage
  • Predicted premium pricing

The Bottom Line

Ozempic revolutionized obesity treatment by showing that pharmacotherapy could achieve 15% weight loss—results previously thought impossible without surgery. Retatrutide nearly doubles that effect at 28.7%, but with trade-offs in side effects and unknowns.

For most patients needing obesity treatment in 2026, Ozempic (as Wegovy) represents the better choice. It's available now, has proven cardiovascular protection, costs no more than retatrutide will cost, and produces substantial weight loss with manageable side effects.

Retatrutide will have a role when it launches in 2028—primarily for patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥40) who need maximum weight reduction, those who didn't achieve adequate results on Ozempic or tirzepatide, or people for whom bariatric surgery isn't an option.

The progression from single to dual to triple agonist shows clear efficacy gains. But each additional hormone pathway brings more side effects. Whether most patients prefer 28.7% weight loss with dysesthesia risk versus 15% weight loss without it remains to be seen.

Sources

  • Wilding JPH, et al. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. NEJM 2021 (STEP 1)
  • Lincoff AM, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity (SELECT). NEJM 2023
  • Eli Lilly TRIUMPH-4 topline results (December 2025)
  • FDA Wegovy prescribing information

Last updated: January 15, 2026

Disclaimer: Retatrutide is investigational and not FDA-approved. Comparisons based on separate trials with different populations. This article does not constitute medical advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is retatrutide better than Ozempic?

Retatrutide produces nearly double the weight loss of Ozempic—28.7% versus 14.9% at 68 weeks. For a 250-pound person, that's 72 pounds lost versus 37 pounds. However, retatrutide causes dysesthesia in 20.9% of patients at the highest dose, has higher discontinuation rates (18.2% vs 7%), and isn't FDA approved yet. Ozempic has proven cardiovascular protection with 20% reduction in heart attacks and strokes, while retatrutide's cardiovascular outcomes trial won't complete until 2027-2028. Higher efficacy doesn't automatically mean "better"—it depends on individual goals, tolerance, and willingness to wait until 2028 for availability.

Should I wait for retatrutide or start Ozempic now?

Start Ozempic (Wegovy) now rather than waiting. Retatrutide won't be available until late 2027 or early 2028, meaning you'd lose 18-24 months of potential weight loss and health improvements. Ozempic is FDA approved, widely available, and delivers substantial results. If you need additional weight reduction when retatrutide launches, you can switch at that time. Insurance will likely require trying Ozempic or tirzepatide first before approving retatrutide anyway due to its expected premium pricing and higher efficacy.

What are the main differences in side effects?

GI side effects (nausea, diarrhea, vomiting) are similar—43-44% nausea for both. The key difference is dysesthesia, affecting 20.9% of retatrutide patients at 12mg. This involves abnormal touch sensations like tingling or numbness not seen with Ozempic. Discontinuation rates are 2.6x higher for retatrutide (18.2%) versus Ozempic (7%). Ozempic has 5+ years of real-world safety data while retatrutide has less than 2 years of trial data.

How do costs compare?

Ozempic (Wegovy) costs $1,349/month. Retatrutide is predicted to cost $1,200-1,500/month when it launches. Despite similar prices, retatrutide may be more cost-effective per pound lost due to higher efficacy. However, insurance coverage will likely be better for Ozempic initially since it's established and proven, while retatrutide will face restrictive coverage requiring prior authorization and trial-and-failure of less expensive options.

Table of contents

Register your interest in Retatrutide

Retatrutide is currently not available, but once it is approved, you’ll be the first to get notified. Sign up now and stay informed.

Simple one-time sign-up

Early access to availability updates

Exclusive status among the first users

Advantage over non-registered users

Retatrutide Rx

Be the First to Know When Retatrutide Launches

Evidence-based updates. No hype. No spam.

Submitting this form does not start treatment or a medical consultation.You’ll only receive educational updates and availability notifications.

Thank you!
Your interest has been registered. We’ll notify you as soon as retatrutide becomes available.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.